Political suggestion for Americans – do not vote for Trump

We all know what Donald Trump is like. On climate change, he changes what he says on each time. However, his beliefs become clear, when we look at his behaviour. He took the USA out of the Paris climate accord, and made every effort to reverse all improvements on this front.

There are many reasons not to vote for Trummp. While there is a baffling desire to support Donald Trump from the Christian right, consider the facts 

  • He is a thrice married man, who has cheated on all his wives
  • He does not have any idea on the bible, and while he tries to suggest he is a Christian, has no idea what the bible contains. 
  • He has no idea what it is to be a Christian, what it means (see video below). Jesus turned himself over to be killed by the authorities, look at what it means, before voting for this man again. You may disagree with everything that Biden has done, but he is clearly a man who has a relationship with God, look at it rationally before voting for a man who has shown himself to be unsuitable for the role.

What is a Donald Trump second term going to mean for the environment, nature and climate change?

  • He is especially opposed to wind power and has promised to halt offshore wind development, which he claims harms marine life. Not only is impact on marine life not true, these are not only the cleanest, but also the cheapest ways to make power (wind and solar is currently around 50% less than coal power, and this is only getting better).
  • Trump greatly expanded the right to hunt on federal land. His changes increased hunting of wolves to such an extent that many years of progress was lost. Grizzly bears are in a similar position, as well as Jaguars and many other more common species.
  • While carbon emissions did fall under Trump, this was despite not because of him. He relaxed rules on carbon emissions from cars (despite the opposite direction that the market is going).
  • He has greatly expanded drilling for both oil and gas, and has no intention of curtailing this. We cannot afford to burn all the fossil fuels, but this is not Trumps position.
  • He rolled back over 100 major climate policies and rolled back many more rules governing clean air, water, wildlife and toxic chemicals, despite his mantra of clean air and clean water. Click here to view a new york times with all of these in detail.
This is just a quick list of some of the reasons why you should not vote for this man. Should you have children, or child relatives, it should be obvious why, and I would hope that even without descendants, you would want to leave the world in a better place.

Please share this, and other similar articles with friends who can vote. Lets help Americans to recognize the danger that Trump poses – analysis shows that should climate change continue, the USA falls in just third from the top, in terms of the amount they are likely to have to pay, should climate change continue.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Is climate change denial over? Well perhaps white-washed into climate doomism

CC by sa 2.0 climate change denial photo credit Edward Kimmel

Why is climate change denial still not over? Because the amount of money that can be made by denying climate change.

Has there been a change? Yes, but not necessarily for the better. For many people (generally with a financial motive) they have gone from outright climate denial, to climate doomism – we have already emitted too much carbon, we are going to see global warming, so there is nothing I can do (this has the advantage of allowing those people to continue to behave in the same way). Climate doomism says, I am too little, I cannot do anything.

Continue reading “Is climate change denial over? Well perhaps white-washed into climate doomism”

Boki the bear, from wildwood enjoys calpol to help with pain after surgery

Boki the bear (2 years old) was found to have a condition that I also have. It is known as hydrocephalus, and is caused when the liquid that is found around the brain does not drain away properly. This is often found in infants, but can also occur after a head injury.

When this liquid does not drain, rather than protecting the brain, this liquid squeezes the brain, which apart from being very painful (it usually causes insanity before death, if left untreated in babies) but can take decades to kill naturally.

It seems quite likely, that this bear would have died relatively quickly in the wild, as even if the illness did not kill, it would likely cause different behaviour which would likely have caused more problems.

While it is true that bears have a sweet tooth, which may have contributed to this bears like for it, they are also very intelligent, and may well have been able to connect the idea of feeling better with the medicine that he was taking.

The worlds trees and land absorbed almost no carbon dioxide last year

For as long as we have emitted large quantities of carbon the world has absorbed the vast majority – no longer?

Pretty much all models that are trying to predict how much danger we are (on global warming) suggest that all current carbon syncs will continue to work, however, that does not appear to be the case.

We have emitted roughly 1500 giga tonnes of carbon dioxide since the industrial revolution, and the total amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 3200 giga tonnes. Before this point, there was roughly 2200 giga tonnes in the atmosphere. These numbers suggest that around 1 quarter has been absorbed by the planet (these numbers could well be wrong but are worked out from well known figures).

This suggests that at least 1 quarter of our emissions have been absorbed, which if this study is right, means 1 third more carbon being added each year, if we simply keep our emissions stable or conversely, we need to cut emissions by an extra third to meet our goals, if this holds true.

Given our difficultly cutting emissions so far, this is going to prove hard.

And yet, we need to do it very fast.

African penguins are being hunted by caracals

African penguins live in South African and Namibia, with a total population of around 18500 (13,200 in South Africa and the rest in Namibia). In south Africa, there are thought to be 2 colonies, with Boulders beach, near Cape town, has a population of around 3000 penguins.

In wilder places, one would think that penguins would be hunted by land mammals, and certainly these behaviours have been filmed, with me remembering footage of a brown hyena hunting penguins on the Namibian beach.

It has generally thought that penguins were relatively safe on Boulders beach, but it is becoming clear that the caracal, which is a smaller cat than a lion or leopard, are living in the area around boulders beach, and are likely the big predator of the penguins. It is true, that cape leopards live in small numbers in this area, and they have been known to take penguins, but being the apex predator, they do not live long-term in the reserve.

This is not the same with the Caracal. This documentary was done around the area of table mountain, but found throughout the cape.

One might argue that this is just natural behaviour, but the problem is that neither species is being able to live in a normal way. In 2016, 2 caracals were documented to have killed 130 penguins in just 2 months. It would not take much more than this, for the African penguin to disappear from South Africa, and indeed the world.

Has France decided their wolf population is too big?

In 2023, the wolf population of France fell by 9%. This population was thought at 1003, down from over 1100.

It should be noted that France, as a large country, is likely to easily be able to support many more wolves than this. There are parts of the country, where wolves have not returned, with their main population lying in the Alps and surrounding areas, but also along the border to the East, and along the south of the country, with another population lying in the Pyrenees (it should be noted that this population is just started – thought to only be 16 individuals, though likely already increased). Should the wolf population in the Pyrenees become stable, wolves would be capable of using them as a staging area for repopulating both Spain and France.

In short? No, there is not too many wolves in France. This is patently absurd. It is true that many people believe that wolves have no place in France. In the UK, while I cannot see any UK government doing something sensible and returning them, there are many benefits. There are likely over 200,000 red deer, and 500,000 roe deer within the French nation. As such, predators are important, and with careful monitoring, the downsides are small.

With care, wolf watching could develop as a significant market within France

See Animals Wild